Forum - Activation Mail

Fligh · Post by **Fligh** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 2:25 pm

Dunno if it's a bug at all or programmed that way, but my activation mail for this forum needed about half an hour to reach me.
Is's a bit annoying if you register yourself to post something that's important for you, and you have to wait half an hour or even longer to get activated.

Is the server overwrought or did you program this delay?

Greetings,
~ Fligh ~

Ceto · Post by **Ceto** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:11 pm

You should post the full message headers. Might want to blank out any personal info like your IP, but these headers would show us exactly where the mail was held up.

Post by **Rollie** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 5:59 pm

Yeah, without knowing more about what route the email took, there's no way to know where the slow down is.

Fligh · Post by **Fligh** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:31 pm

right ... i was so impatient i registered two times ... here the part of the header of the second mail ... which travelled about 2 hours:

Code: Select all

X-Original-To&#58; mymail@arcor.de
Received&#58; from localhost &#40;mail-in-04.arcor-online.net &#91;151.189.21.44&#93;&#41; by mail-in-01-z2.arcor-online.net &#40;Postfix&#41; with ESMTP id 135882C6B82 for <mymail>; Sat,  7 Apr 2007 23&#58;04&#58;04 +0200 &#40;CEST&#41;
Received&#58; from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net &#40;&#91;127.0.0.1&#93;&#41; by localhost &#40;mail-in-04 &#91;127.0.0.1&#93;&#41; &#40;amavisd-new, port 10024&#41; with LMTP id 26934-06 for <mymail>; Sat,  7 Apr 2007 23&#58;04&#58;04 +0200 &#40;CEST&#41;
Received&#58; from s2.cooperhosting.net &#40;s2.cooperhosting.net &#91;64.34.178.161&#93;&#41; by mx.arcor.de &#40;Postfix&#41; with ESMTP id CF62317F4FB for <mymail>; Sat,  7 Apr 2007 23&#58;04&#58;03 +0200 &#40;CEST&#41;
Received&#58; from s2.cooperhosting.net &#40;&#91;64.34.178.161&#93; helo=mail.warcraftrealms.com&#41; by s2.cooperhosting.net with esmtpa &#40;Exim 4.63&#41; &#40;envelope-from <rollie>&#41; id 1HaGve-0007f0-WD for mymail @arcor.de; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14&#58;50&#58;31 -0500

aipomlee · Post by **aipomlee** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:20 pm

dunno if this is imprtant, but when it came to me it was under spam. other than that it was fine.

Skyfire · Post by **Skyfire** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:13 am

aipomlee wrote:dunno if this is imprtant, but when it came to me it was under spam. other than that it was fine.

Normal behavior (almost spelled that with a "u"). Also unrelated.